home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: zetnet.co.uk!demon!redrobe.demon.co.uk
- From: Mike@Redrobe.demon.co.uk (Mike)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.applications,comp.sys.amiga.hardware,comp.sys.amiga.misc,comp.sys.amiga.tech
- Subject: Re: Why Amiga sucks and why it does't
- Date: 22 Jan 96 14:43:48 +0000
- Message-ID: <1044.6595T883T2412@Redrobe.demon.co.uk>
- References: <4du4j5$8bl@mo6.rc.tudelft.nl>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: redrobe.demon.co.uk
- X-NNTP-Posting-Host: redrobe.demon.co.uk
- X-Newsreader: THOR 2.22 (Amiga;TCP/IP)
-
-
- >Greg Thomson (kbull@garlic.com) wrote:
- >: Ok, here is why I think Amigas, includeing my A1200 with a 50 Mhz 030 and
- >: 16 megs of ram suck:
- >:
- >: 1. Good and fast browsers do not exist
-
- Aweb is getting there...or use netscape on Shapeshifter if you have the ram...
-
- >Personally, I don't give a damn for good and fast browsers, since my modem
- >is a huge bottleneck. I prefer using good ole' telnet :). Manually, that is.
-
- >: 2. Graphics cards are too expensive and they are not as fast as their PC
- >: counterparts.
-
- too expensive, yes....but thats because so few are sold....
- But the S3 isnt exactly old or slow in PC gfx terms... (its in the CV64)
-
- >: 3. Amigas are expensive
-
- >Yes, they are. But they don't require you buying a completely new setup every
- >two years as well.
-
- > Maarten D. de Jong |
-
-
-
- Mike
-
- --
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Mike Redrobe - Mike@Redrobe.demon.co.uk MikeRR on #Amiga
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-